The texts of this group are a small sample of a very large documentary category, called "sealings," but at times referred to as "bullae": pieces or lumps of clay, of oblong or circular shape, bearing the impression of a stamp seal, and used to secure a knot or to hold fast a container of sorts. The fact that many objects shipped or transferred within the NA empire were sealed, is supported both by the many hundreds of extant sealings, official or private (cf. Herbordt, SAAS 1, passim) and by textual information regarding shipments (cf. e.g. SAA 1 5 1, gold; SAA 5 206, tunics; SAA 10 210, fingernail cuttings of the king for magic purposes).
As used here, the term "sealing" (which is at times replaced by "docket" ; cf. TCAE, p. 19 and n. 1) refers only to the inscribed exemplars of the category. As a textual genre its uniqueness lies, of course, in the fact of being, by and large, a mere "script" accompanying an "act": i.e. an occasional addition to the two essential administrative actions of securing a specific contents by means of the clay and sanctioning such a measure through the impression of the seal. Of course, a written text on the clay sealing would also seem to have had the effect of adding security against any unauthorized opening of the "package" or any tampering with the goods (cf. on this count e.g. SAA 10 348, a letter by Mar-Issar to Esarhaddon certifying that he has received jewelry from the king "with the seal intact," NA4 . KIŠIB šalmu).
This said, each specimen may yield a more precise picture of its function not only through the inscription itself - where the contents, the administrative occasion and often the date of the sealing may be indicated - but also from a study of the markings of string or other objects left on the clay, when present, which may provide a clue as to the nature of the container. The seal impres sion itself is, of course, also a factor to be reckoned with - although in general this material appears to bear the standard Assyrian royal seal, and sports only quite rarely seals of specific individuals (cf. Herbordt, SAAS 1, Abb. 7-1 1, Taf. 33-36). In a survey of the available material from all points of view, including the inscribed sealings from Calah, Herbordt has recently brought forth a functional classification of the NA sealings (SAAS 1, pp. 53ff) from which the following division of our material is drawn:
Many of the sealings bear dates. A number belong to the reign of Sargon: no. 65 (719 BC, i.e. the eponymy of Sargon himself), no. 68 (717) , no. 49 (715), and no. 69 (713). Surprisingly enough, on the other hand, we have four sealings dated to the reign of Sennacherib: nos. 50 (699), 51, 53, and 54 (695). The two kings might also be entitled to share the two fragmentary dates, no. 70 (= 721 or 711 BC, cf. discussion in app. crit.), and no. 52, which according to Postgate might refer to 682 BC, on the basis of a professional designation attested in Aramaic ( cf. Fales Epigraphs, pp. 135ff). Other chronological indicators derive from the findspot of the documents: texts nos. 61-64 were found in Dur-Sarruken, and thus may be referred to Sargon's reign. Whether the lack of any inscribed sealings for the reigns of Esarhaddon and Assurbanipal is due to the ever-convenient chance element in discovery, or to a historical factor of sorts, is hard to say at present (the Calah exemplars are undated - except for the Shalmaneser exemplar mentioned above, and ND 807, which goes back to 716 BC!).
F.M. Fales & J.N. Postgate
F.M. Fales & J.N. Postgate, 'Sealings', Imperial Administrative Records, Part II: Provincial and Military Administration, SAA 11. Original publication: Helsinki, Helsinki University Press, 1995; online contents: SAAo/SAA11 Project, a sub-project of MOCCI, 2021 [http://oracc.org/saao/saa11/ProvincialAdministrationandTaxation/Sealings/]